Washington Voters Trumpet and Roar Against Wildlife Trafficking – Sending Signal to the Nation

By on November 4, 2015 with 5 Comments

In as emphatic an electoral triumph as you will see in American politics, Washington voters approved I-1401, giving the measure decisive majorities in every one of the state’s 39 counties. The measure to criminalize the trade in the parts of 10 different species and taxa of terrestrial and marine species was approved by a vote of 71 to 29 percent, with the percentage likely to creep up a bit as more ballots are counted in the populous counties with late vote-by-mail tallies.

I-1401 was the first statewide ballot measure on the subject of global wildlife trafficking, and it just so happened to be the most comprehensive proposal considered in any state – covering not just elephants and rhinos, but also lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, pangolins, sea turtles, sharks, and rays.

I extend our greatest appreciation to Paul Allen, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist, who conceived of the measure and put his shoulder and resources behind it. The HSUS was delighted to partner with him on this project, and we look forward to conducting similar efforts in other states, starting with Oregon, where we’ve already launched a similar campaign.

The Washington vote was a drubbing for the NRA and for ivory traders who succeeded in blocking a less ambitious measure in the state capitol in Olympia earlier this year. Despite their opposition, animal protectionists were also able to pass a ban last month on the commercial trade in ivory and rhino horn in California – the most important place to do it, given the significant size of its in-state market for ivory and rhino horn products. But the NRA and other pro-ivory groups blocked carefully crafted measures in more than a half dozen other states, including in Oregon.

The NRA and other advocates and defenders of the ivory trade have been active in Congress, too. With President Obama declaring that he wants to significantly curtail the trade in ivory through federal rulemaking, Republican lawmakers inserted a provision in the proposed House Interior spending bill to block the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from finalizing any such rule. We are working with some Republicans and most of the House and Senate Democratic caucuses to nix that provision in the final spending package. We don’t expect it to be retained in any form, in part because President Obama would veto any spending bill with a poison pill for a regulatory action he clearly cares about.

But the Washington vote should be a wake-up call for all of those politicians at the state and federal level who have sided with the idea of tolerating the domestic ivory trade or who believe it’s okay to trade in other parts from endangered animals. The overwhelming passage of I-401 makes clear that this is not a left-center-or-right issue. It’s a right-and-wrong issue. This is an issue of protecting the most majestic species in the world, and making sure that people understand that there is some small amount of sacrifice within our borders required to protect these species. The reason that poachers kill animals is to sell the parts in consumer countries. The House this week, with bi-partisan support from Republicans and Democrats, did favor the Global Anti-Poaching Act, championed by House Foreign Affairs committee Chair Ed Royce and Ranking member Eliot Engel, to strengthen the U.S. response to wildlife trafficking and to upgrade penalties and to treat trafficking of illegal wildlife on this scale as a racketeering activity. I applaud the House and Senate for strengthening anti-poaching enforcement activities, but that effort must be linked with efforts in the United States and other consuming countries to criminalize sales of the products at home. China is the biggest consumer of ivory, and the United States is second.

This is not just an issue of protecting animals, as worthy a purpose as that is. It’s an issue of fighting terrorists and other criminals who are slaughtering these animals to turn their body parts into cash. It’s also an issue of economic security for African and Asian nations whose greatest natural resource is the wildlife that inhabit their protected areas. Those goals warrant restricting trade in the United States and pushing people into selling facsimiles of ivory or other beautiful and durable cruelty-free products that can decorate homes or adorn us as jewelry.

In yesterday’s election day outcome, we didn’t just win in Seattle and the rest of the Puget Sound area. We won in every county in the state – every Republican-leaning and Republican-dominated county in Washington, which butts up against Idaho in the East.

Every lawmaker who stood in the way of the anti-ivory-trade bill in the legislature earlier this year should take stock of what his or her constituents said. They said, and clearly, “we actually support a much tougher statewide policy than you considered in the capitol. We want reform. Get out of the way.” Voters in every single state house, state senate, and Congressional district favored I-1401. Ironically for the ivory-trading set, their success in blocking a more limited bill delivered a much more sweeping policy for the state, and set a precedent for the rest of the nation to heed.

Lawmakers who continue to carry the water of the NRA do so at some political peril, because they are defying the people of their state. Washington provided the first hard measure of where voters stand on the issue. They heard the arguments of the ivory dealers and the gun and ammo lobby, and they rejected those arguments. Gun owners, Republicans, older men, and younger men all rejected those arguments, along with every other demographic group.

People want to protect elephants, rhinos, and other creatures. And they are tired of the selfish, self-centered arguments of opponents, who say the restrictions are too burdensome or unnecessary or impact private property rights. Let’s hope last night’s vote is yet another turning point – on top of China’s joining of our global movement – against wildlife trafficking. Time for all of politicians to read the election results, recognize ivory and other endangered-animal body parts as contraband, and join the movement to protect the marvelous creatures who share our planet and enrich it with their mere existence.

Categories
Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

5 Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

Sites That Link to This Post

  1. November 5, 2015 | | November 5, 2015
  1. cheryl pickett says:

    Proud to be a Washingtonian today – and Eastern Washington at that!

  2. Bonnie Heimbigner says:

    Thank heavens we have smart people in Washington State. This same initiative needs to be passed in ALL 50 states.

    I know this isn’t exactly what we’re discussing here but I am ADAMANT that our government saves the American Heritage and does NOT allow ANY horses to be slaughtered. I’ve read our illustrious government are sending about 150,000 horses to both Mexico & Canada to be slaughtered. I understood our policies don’t allow that either. PLEASE………..someone help save our beautiful horses. They’ve worked hard and been our ever companions while populating the wild USA. How dare our government send them to other countries to be cruelly slaughtered. We are finally trying to get a handle on stopping the slaughter in the US. It should be illegal to transport these beautiful animals across the borders. I wish I had a bunch of money but sorry to say, I don’t. I’m not able to donate to these causes like I want to but I pray the people who DO have the resources PLEASE chip in and help our National Heritage!! Thank you.

  3. MARY ANNE KOWALSKI says:

    The White Deer of the Seneca Army Depot needs the HSUS Wildlife Trust to keep their home since 1941 from becoming a canned hunt.

    Please help.

    The white deer of Seneca Depot are stunningly beautiful and only number about 200. For decades they have thrived and wowed the locals. But, the Seneca County Industrial Development Agency (IDA) has announced that it will soon start accepting bids on the depot’s 7,000 acres. If the wrong developer offers the highest price, this herd of white deer could disappear.

    In all of the previous plans for the depot, a permanent conservation area was designated. However, it seems as if no such concessions are on the table this time. The conservation area would most likely be approximately 1500 acres, with a 60-acre pond, and would provide a secure, natural setting for the herd, as well as other native flora and fauna. We think this concession must be included in any sale.

    Please join the Seneca Depot Conservation Alliance ( SDCA) in asking the IDA to require any bidder to set aside adequate habitat for the herd to thrive without disruption. These deer are part of our New York heritage, and should be protected so many more get a chance to see just how amazing they are.

    The IDA is eager to see the depot returned to the tax rolls, increasing the county’s tax base and serving as an economic asset. This is understandable, but the fact is, a dedicated conservation area could be a boon rather than a burden — for years now, tours of the Seneca Depot have been mostly closed, and many of the hundreds of thousands of tourists that visit the area annually have been turned away when they’ve sought to see the white deer herd. This is cold hard cash that isn’t going into Seneca County’s coffers. The costs of keeping a conservation area would be easily covered by charging entry and providing outdoor recreation opportunities for the tourists that come to the Finger Lakes annually for wine tasting, boating and the famed Watkins Glenn State Park.

    This area is not only the home to the white deer, but is designated an Important Bird Area by the Audubon Society for its many Bald Eagles, Northern Harriers, and Short-Eared Owls. Moving ahead with a sale without designating a conservation area will doom the white deer and the other unique species.

  4. countryweddinginvitations says:

    His books are incredibly The God Delusion sounds like it’s going to be is diatribe but it’s full of eloquent writing like

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top