Department of Commerce move to nix protections for whales, dolphins, turtles makes no sense

By on June 14, 2017 with 5 Comments

On Monday, the Trump administration announced that it was cancelling plans that would have protected whales, dolphins, and endangered sea turtles from high levels of drowning deaths in drift gillnets set off the California coast. The most puzzling thing about this announcement is that the fishery itself had supported the plan. It’s yet one more example of politicians taking more extreme positions than industry — akin to the case of several farm-state attorneys general fighting California’s anti-confinement laws for laying hens even after the egg industry recognized that it must transition to a cage-free future.

The marine-animal protection plan was the result of negotiations between environmentalists and fishermen. It would have capped the annual number of deaths by species and then temporarily closed the fishery if these mortality caps were exceeded. This joint agreement was something of a triumph for all parties, and the Pacific Fisheries Management Council—the federal management body for west coast fisheries—agreed to put the agreement into writing and forward it to the National Marine Fisheries Service in the Department of Commerce for approval. It is fairly rare that a regional fishery-management council’s proposal would be overruled by bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. When the federal government sought public comments on the plan in October last year, shortly before the election, it attracted widespread support (including from The HSUS) and little dissent. But, in a baffling turnaround, the Department of Commerce has now stamped the plan with a giant “NO.” The agency is overruling its own fishery management council as well as the fisheries that agreed to the plan, along with the countless citizens who weighed in and overwhelmingly favored this new, conservation-minded legal framework.

To be clear, the administration is saying “no” to proactively protecting endangered leatherback turtles, and it is saying “no” to a plan that would have limited the entanglement-related deaths of endangered sperm whales. In fact, it was the deaths of sperm whales that prompted the Council to take this step when it became convinced that the Department of Commerce had not acted intentionally to prevent future deaths.

Marine mammals remain some of the most beloved creatures in the country. Sperm whales are legend, especially since the publication of Herman Melville’s classic Moby Dick 166 years ago. Dolphins are revered, with scientists documenting their intelligence and mariners recounting their acts of heroism to save sailors. Leatherback sea turtles, whose mass can exceed half a ton, are a sight to behold for land-based tourists and underwater divers and contribute immensely to the economy of coastal communities. These creatures do warrant special protection. When the fishery that has threatened them and the environmental and animal welfare community that have advocated for them find common ground, politicians and executive agencies should rush to bless the outcome. We have enough division in the country without searching for and sowing disunity where it doesn’t exist.

Categories
Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

5 Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. mattie goodwin says:

    donald trump needs to quit acting inexperienced and messing up good plans in the government! this is strange that he would take away protections from this marine life and animals!

  2. Elly Opal says:

    What can be done about all the damage the Trump administration is doing?

  3. Betty Zimanski says:

    How much damage is this president going to do? Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord, not protecting our ocean’s wildlife, what is next? Eliminating all regulations, whether they are beneficial or not, seems to be the goal. Of course, none of this makes sense. Welcome to Trump world.

  4. Elyse DeWyngaert says:

    Another example of arrogance and a destructive mindset. We need to protect our environment and the varied species that inhabit it.

  5. Susanne Ketner says:

    The man claims to be a Christian. Jesus said “take care of my lambs”, meaning care for ALL the animals, not just some !

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top