Putting the Override Effort in Overdrive

By on September 17, 2013 with 0 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

It’s been a remarkable 18-month period when it comes to the movement to combat the intensive confinement of animals on factory farms. The public, major food retailers, numerous producers, and so many lawmakers have turned against the idea of allowing immobilization of animals as a customary animal production practice. In today’s paper, USA Today not only condemned the King amendment to the Farm Bill (which seeks to nullify state laws banning extreme confinement of animals and standards on food safety and animal welfare), but also affirmed its support for federal legislation to ban the extreme confinement of laying hens in barren battery cages.

But perhaps the biggest story of the period has been the repudiation of gestation crates – confinement cages for breeding sows in the pig industry – by the nation’s major food sellers. After McDonald’s announced its plan to phase out the crates in February 2012, Burger King, Safeway, Costco, Cracker Barrel, Sodexo, and about 50 other major food retailers followed suit. 

Gestation crateAfter seeing the top eight supermarket chains in Canada make a similar announcement, the National Farm Animal Care Council, a semi-governmental standard-setting body in the country, issued a preliminary plan to ban any new construction of gestation crates in 2014 and to phase out current crates as well. That means all 10 provinces in Canada may phase out gestation crates if the policy is made final.

In the United States, New Jersey lawmakers aligned themselves with legislators in nine other states and overwhelmingly voted earlier this year to ban gestation crates. But surprisingly, Gov. Chris Christie vetoed that bill.

Today, in a press conference with state Sen. Raymond Lesniak, the author of the bill in New Jersey, I joined colleagues in the animal protection movement in asking lawmakers to affirm their original votes to ban gestation crates. The Senate, following Lesniak’s lead, voted 35 to 1 in favor of S. 1921, and the Assembly voted 60 to 5. Democrats and Republicans, by commanding majorities, favored this common-sense, humane policy of not confining sows in tiny crates. All animals deserve humane treatment, including those raised for food. It’s wrong to immobilize animals in cages so small that the creatures cannot even turn around.

Today, The HSUS is launching a $150,000 advertising campaign in the state asking for lawmakers to uphold their original determination on this legislation. If they do, they’ll succeed in overriding an unfair and inexplicable veto. New Jersey is one of the leading animal welfare states in the nation, and New Jersey lawmakers want to build on that record by enacting S. 1921.

Categories
Farm Animals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top