Bobcat Trapping, Hunting Blocked in N.H.; Grizzly Battle Looms in Northern Rockies

By on April 13, 2016 with 4 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

Bowing to an enormous outpouring of public concern and outrage, combined with compelling arguments that made its original plan vulnerable to a legal challenge, the New Hampshire Fish and Game Commission today voted to withdraw a proposal to initiate a bobcat hunting, hounding, and trapping season. It is a stunning turnaround for bobcats – protected in the state since 1989 – and it prevents, at least for the foreseeable future, the killing of these gorgeous animals for their pelts and heads. Our New Hampshire state director, Lindsay Hamrick, was a leader in the fight and rallied thousands of New Hampshire citizens to object to the plan.

Emails obtained by The HSUS showed that despite thousands of comments submitted by state residents opposing the proposal, several commissioners had made up their minds prior to the public comment period, and intentionally disregarded any input from what they called the “antis,” or non-hunting New Hampshire residents. But so many citizens stood side-by-side in challenging the proposal, and multiple hunters, biologists, conservationists, animal welfare activists, and trappers spoke out against it. Hundreds of people showed up to testify against the proposal at public hearings.

A key moment came when The HSUS persuaded the state’s Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules (JLCAR) to challenge the propriety of the Fish and Game Commission’s original 5-4 vote on the proposal in February. JLCAR decided to formally object to the proposal on the grounds – set forward in a legal comment submitted by The HSUS – that it violated the Endangered Species Act and exposed the state to unacceptable legal and financial liabilities. This determination no doubt led directly to today’s game-changing decision by the Fish and Game Commission.

But even as we celebrate the victory for bobcats in the Granite State, we have other big fights for predators brewing elsewhere, and none more high profile than our efforts to protect grizzly bears in the northern Rockies. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed stripping federal protections under the Endangered Species Act for grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, and wildlife authorities from Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have already made clear their intentions to open up trophy hunting seasons on the bears.

A majority of Americans want Yellowstone’s grizzly bears not dead but alive: a new national poll shows that 55 percent  of them oppose the FWS proposal to remove federal protections for grizzly bears in Yellowstone, and an overwhelming percent of people, 68 percent in a nationwide sample, oppose trophy hunting.

Yesterday, HSUS staff members joined hundreds of citizens —hunters, environmentalists, animal advocates, and local residents—in Bozeman, Montana, to voice our concerns at the second of only two public hearings that the FWS is holding on the delisting. We did the same at the FWS hearing on Monday in Cody, Wyoming. We are urging FWS to extend the comment period on this proposal from May 10 for an additional 60 days so that more people have time to weigh in.

Attitudes toward these animals have undergone a sea change since America’s early settlers and their descendants nearly wiped out the grizzly bear in the lower 48 states. Today, according to the poll conducted by Remington Research Group on behalf of The HSUS and Wyoming Wildlife Advocates, more than 80 percent of Americans believe the grizzlies are a valuable part of the Yellowstone area.

Grizzlies, considered the most famous bears in the world, are worth far more alive than dead. In 2013, Yellowstone Park alone received 3.2 million visits, worth $382 million, as tourists flooded the area to catch a glimpse of its beautiful surroundings and, of course, its magnificent wildlife – including the most famous and studied bear, Grizzly 399.  Grizzly bears are a big part of the economic equation and among the most coveted of sights for visitors to the park.

I remember the first time I saw a grizzly in Yellowstone – that image is still fixed in my head and it’s perhaps the most memorable experience I’ve ever had at Yellowstone or any other park.

Today, as we celebrate the lifesaving win for bobcats in New Hampshire, let’s not forget that delisting the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s grizzly bear will surely result in the persecution of these beautiful animals and a decline in their population. Join me in opposing this ill-conceived proposal and tell FWS to maintain federal protections for these bears.

Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Kay Campbell says:

    It is interesting to me–a native of WYoming–the state wants to open up trophy hunting on the Grizzly bear at the tune of $3.2 million. This is a state involved in fraudulent off shore shenanigans with bogus corporations such as in the Panama papers indicating this lowly populated state has its priorities screwed up. The fact 55 percent of Americans want the Grizzly protected, which tells me Game & Fish and the state are going against citizens, money for the state, and senselessly killing magnificent animals for personal gain. Disgusting!

    • David Bernazani says:

      State governments and commissions are infamous for acting against the majority of their constituents’ wishes.
      If you’re a reader of Wayne’s blog, you’ll hear about this happening all too often. He may have even already written about Wyoming, if memory serves.
      I wish you luck in a state like that, and hearing about it reminds me how lucky I am to live in California– probably the best state overall for showing kindness to our fellow animals.

  2. David Bernazani says:

    So I see yet another state fish & game commission tried to open up hunting of some of New Hampshire’s beautiful wild animals for slob trophy hunters and trappers to cruelly kill.
    You would think a so-named commission was supposed to be charged with protecting their state’s wildlife. Unfortunately, all too often these commissions are composed of hunters themselves, and/or people who profit from such hunting and trapping.
    Luckily, their idiotic proposal was defeated.
    Perhaps it’s time for New Hampshire residents to have a closer look at who exactly hese commissioners are.

  3. KIKUE NISHIO says:


Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.