Grizzly bears under the gun in Yellowstone region

By on August 24, 2016 with 6 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming are aligned on the idea of removing federal Endangered Species Act protections for Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bears, and we could be looking at a federal delisting as early as this autumn. This, despite the fact that most of the American public polled wants these bears to remain protected, and fewer Americans still have any stomach for the thought of the states unleashing trophy hunters to kill these animals in the lower 48 states for the first time in decades.

Even while federally protected, grizzly bears are fighting for their lives. According to data released by the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team (IGBST), the bears’ 10-year mortality trend has increased at a rate that should prompt federal wildlife managers to redouble conservation efforts, not turn the management of bears over to states hell-bent on adding yet another form of human-caused mortality. A new IGBST document reveals a record number of Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) grizzly bear deaths in 2015. With the help of longtime grizzly bear advocate Louisa Willcox, we’ve discovered that 85 GYE bears died last year, including Scarface, a 25-year-old iconic Yellowstone grizzly bear, who was shot and killed outside the park’s boundary. This year, a record 35 bears have already been killed, and we haven’t even made it to fall, when most bear deaths occur. There’s no way this is acceptable or sustainable, and it makes it pretty darn clear that delisting is flat-out dangerous for the health of this population.

The removal of federal protections comes at the same time that grizzly bears’ historic major food sources — such as whitebark pine seeds and cutthroat trout — are in decline because of human causes, including climate change. As a result, grizzly bears must turn to foods either outside the safe boundaries of the Park, or rely on elk, deer, and other large animals inside the park – which often puts the bears, especially young cubs, at risk of predation from other native carnivores.

To get to the delisting finish line, Montana and Wyoming have fast-tracked their public processes, illegally tripping over public notice requirements, withholding key documents from public view, and otherwise failing to fully keep the public in the loop. To hold them accountable, The HSUS, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and a retired U.S. Geological Survey employee, filed a lawsuit challenging the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission’s illegal adoption of grizzly bear hunting regulations that open the door for trophy hunting once the bears are stripped of Endangered Species Act protections. The Commission voted to approve a regulation that was not even made available to the public. This follows on the heels of our ongoing litigation in Wyoming, where the commission adopted grizzly hunting regulations without giving the public sufficient time to comment on reams of public documents. It’s become clear that the states – like FWS – are committed to delisting GYE bears as quickly as possible, even if that means running roughshod over public input, scientific dissent, and state law.

The USFWS plans to allow the public to comment on its delisting proposed rule, but not on the GYE grizzly bear Conservation Strategy Plan, which was substantially altered by a panel of biologists, none of whom were GYE grizzly bear experts (one, for example, was an expert on the black bears of Kentucky). The new Conservation Strategy Plan fails to provide for a sufficient no-hunting buffer around the Yellowstone National Park, a fact that caused Superintendent Dan Wenk to protest, to no avail, at a recent meeting.

There’s just no compelling reason for the feds to put these bears at the mercy of the states. This is a small population of a few hundred bears that is geographically isolated, and at risk from a growing array of threats. The new mortality data alone should cause federal officials to slam on the brakes for its delisting effort. What’s more, the bears are a primary lure for millions of people who come to Yellowstone. Yes, they love to see the waterfalls,hot springs, and other features of the landscape, but they are most interested in seeing the bears and the wolves. How’s allowing hunters to kill them in the fall going to play with the public?

The states have dealt with a no-hunting standard for decades, and there’s no reason to discard that sensible policy, especially as public attitudes have solidified around the position that killing these animals for their heads is unacceptable. When there are conflicts, there are a host of practical, non-lethal solutions, such as removing stillborn calves and lambs from the landscape, that can deter grizzly bear conflict by over 90 percent.

The HSUS remains strongly opposed to the proposed delisting. The best available science indicates that these animals require far more protections right now, not less. The public process involved has been deplorable and the agencies involved do not seem to be aware of either the science or what the majority of the public wants.

Protect grizzly bears from trophy hunters »

Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Dafne (Cheechako) says:

    WTF’s wring with this people for God’s sake!!! They’re destroying my wildlife!!! (Crying). How we can stop this. Please tell me there’ll really really soon a protest to call everyone to impeding this genocide. Is tihs manage by Republicants? We can’t allow this. If I could only be an attorney by now to go ferocious against tjis battle I wouldn’t mine to put my lufe @ risk. The only one who we must fear is God himself, the Almightty Omnipotent. Please call for a protest. URGENT!!!!!!!

  2. Angela says:

    Can we start a petition against this ?

  3. Connie says:

    It looks like government is not acting on behalf of the people, which is their job. They will kill all grizzlies to make wealth by exploiting the land. We cannot let this happen. Vote for those who will protect our sacred grizzlies and our natural heritage

  4. Sandy Smith says:

    There’s also a White House petition for Pres. Obama –

  5. Steve Schmidt says:

    There is, of course, a very compelling reason to delist this population of grizzly bears. That is, according to the Endangered Species Act, this population has long since met all the standards for delisting. Furthermore, questions about the bears ability to adapt to changing food sources have already been studied and addressed by the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team. They found that the bears are highly adaptable and doing well. In fact, it is now clear that suitable habitat is full of bears. No surprise that bears are expanding beyond their core habitat and that more bears are getting into trouble on the edges of their habitat. It is also false to assume that this delisting decision should be based on public opinion. In the United States, we still strive to operate via laws enacted by federal and state governments. Decisions about delisting a species are directed by the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This population of grizzly bears is long overdue for delisting as per the standards of the ESA. When the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) solicits public comments, they are in effect asking, “Did we miss anything?” The USFWS is particularly interested if any part of the delisting process or pertinent science has been overlooked. The public comment process is not intended to be a public opinion vote whether the public wants the bears to be delisted. Rather, this decision is based on points of law. The key question is, “Have the bears recovered to a point where, by law, federal protection is no longer warranted?” How the bears are managed after delisting is a matter for each state to determine as long as minimum population metrics are maintained. Federal law provides states the authority to determine how wildlife in state borders that is not listed as threatened or endangered via the ESA should be managed. I am confident the three states intend to provide perpetual conservation of these bears after delisting. If folks don’t like how the states intend to manage bears, they would do well to remember who the Trustees are for state managed wildlife (that is elected officials). If a different management plan is desired, then elect different Trustees.

  6. Diana bendzel says:

    Please do not lift the endangered spieces act on the Yellowstone bears.

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.