Breaking news: U.S. Senate clears bill to curb wildlife trafficking

By on September 16, 2016 with 3 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

Last night, the U.S. Senate acted to curb wildlife trafficking when it passed the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt (END) Wildlife Trafficking Act (H.R. 2494), sending it back to the House for final action. This bipartisan legislation, which was championed by Sens. Chris Coons, D-Del., and Jeff Flake R-Ariz., provides tools and resources necessary to combat the global poaching crisis that threatens some of the world’s most iconic species with extinction. A parallel effort has been led in the House by Reps. Ed Royce, R-Calif., and Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., and we expect the House to take up the bill next week.

Poaching and the trafficking in wildlife and wildlife parts constitute a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, with thousands of species and tens of millions of individual creatures traded for cash. The fate of large, iconic species, such as elephants, rhinoceros, and tigers, depends on the ability of our species to turn around this problem, place restrictions on the trade, and impose penalties that will choke it. It’s a global problem and a global fight, and we are playing on that stage, depending on governments in particular to help stem the trade.

The END Wildlife Trafficking Act will help the United States and partner countries counter criminals profiting from international wildlife trafficking. The bill aims to support global anti-poaching efforts, promote greater collaboration among stakeholders to stop poaching and wildlife trafficking, and reduce the profitability of poaching and wildlife trafficking.

As long as wildlife trafficking offers high financial rewards with relatively low risk, it’s an irresistible enterprise for bands of criminals. To address this issue, the bill also incorporates provisions that would increase penalties for wildlife trafficking crimes, bringing them in line with other serious criminal acts like drug, arms, and human trafficking – which can all involve the very same illicit networks engaged in wildlife trafficking. This language, championed by Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., would allow serious wildlife infractions to trigger significant penalties under money-laundering statutes.

In 2013, the Obama Administration issued an executive order to combat wildlife trafficking, outlining a broad, interagency approach to “strengthen enforcement, reduce demand and increase cooperation.” The END Wildlife Trafficking Act builds on that work.

The problem of wildlife trafficking cannot be won with a single bill or executive action, or the actions of a single nation. The roots of killing and trading in wildlife are tangled and deep. But more and more nations realize that maintaining populations of wildlife is a key component of their future economic matrix. In short, it’s in the interests of nations and communities to protect wildlife and to keep the poachers and traffickers at bay. For nations like the United States, which are engaged in a global fight against terrorism, it’s an issue of not just wildlife security, but also national and global security. Illegal wildlife trafficking is extremely lucrative, netting billions of dollars annually, and often attracts highly organized transnational criminal syndicates and terrorist organizations. Wildlife rangers fighting poaching and trafficking on the frontlines lose their lives to these well-armed criminals with alarming frequency.

As with so many animal issues, doing the right thing for them turns out to be the right thing for us. We hope the House acts quickly to pass the END Wildlife Trafficking Act and sends it on to President Obama as a capstone to his determined efforts to protect elephants, rhinos, and other species, preserving these dramatic life forms that so many of us cherish.

Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Michael Ciocci says:

    One can only hope that our bought and sold politicians are on board when the time comes. It all sounds good , but I have no faith that our selfish politicians will do the right thing. If it does not benefit them in some fashion I doubt there will be change.

  2. Rich Stafford says:

    I just checked the bill’s status in the House. It appears the House agreed with the Senate’s amendment so the next step should be it goes to the President for his signature.
    I agree with Michael Ciocci’s comment. Let’s hope our government will do the right thing.

  3. Jane Anne Bell says:

    I’m from England but know that this bill affects all countries with an interest in wildlife preservation. I believe a society can be measured on how it treats those it deems to be weaker than itself, in this case: animals. The USA has the power to make this real and be world leaders in enacting wildlife protection bills. I truly hope your government will indeed do the right thing. Many people in the UK are keen to see this dreadful thing stamped out once and for all. Fingers crossed and keep fighting the good fight!

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.