Horse soring crowd conspires with USDA to bury vast trove of inspection reports

By on February 10, 2017 with 7 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s jarring removal of thousands of Animal Welfare Act and Horse Protection Act inspection reports from its website has caused anger among animal advocates, concern among many in the regulated industries who want to be able to show their clean records, and condemnation from opinion-leaders, lawmakers, and a wide range of others concerned about good governance. The records removed documented the treatment of animals at nearly 8,000 facilities and events, including research laboratories, horse competitions, roadside zoos, and dog breeding operations across the country.

With no cabinet secretary overseeing USDA – former Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue has been nominated but not confirmed yet – it’s been difficult to pin down which individuals at the agency are responsible for this adverse action. We do know, though, that the USDA transition leader hired by the Trump team is Brian Klippenstein, whose full time job is to thwart animal protection goals on behalf of Forrest Lucas’ “Protect the Harvest.” Klippenstein has campaigned against bills, ballot measures, and rules to crack down on puppy mills, horse soring operations, extreme farm animal confinement practices, horse slaughter, and much more.

Obama’s Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, according to The Washington Post, said he didn’t sign off on the idea of the data purge. He did, however, say litigation was one of the factors that had been stirring discussion within the USDA. It appears that some folks at the USDA – under the limited threat of a lawsuit from two Tennessee walking horse owners cited for violations of the Horse Protection Act and challenging the posting of information about their alleged violations of the anti-soring law – were quick to seize that opportunity to take down a vast trove of information related not just to that industry, but related to puppy mills, animal research facilities, and many other players.

Specifically, in February 2016, Lee and Mike McGartland of Contender Farms, both with histories of alleged HPA violations, filed an action along with other industry players against the USDA claiming the agency’s horse protection program violated their rights to due process. Through the pleadings to the court, they also argued the infringement of their rights through the posting of the USDA’s inspection reports, which expose the names of alleged abusers.

The USDA has been defending against the McGartland suit, and it would be odd for the agency to not only reverse its position in the courts that the agency had every right to post the violations, but to effectively universalize their concern and do a take-down of every inspection record conducted by the USDA under the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act.

When you have an enforcement program, some of the alleged violators of the law are going to fight back and make counter-arguments, kicking and screaming and coming up with excuses and arguments to support their position. That’s what’s happened here.

What a horrid precedent it would be for the USDA or any enforcement agency to cave in and gut aspects of its enforcement program when a violator of the law isn’t happy with legal actions taken against them. Can you imagine the chaos that would result in our society if those responsible for overseeing the laws were so timid?

Simply put, there is no court order looming that could justify or compel the USDA’s midnight takedown of its entire animal inspections database. Indeed, as it relates to the McGartland suit, there hasn’t even been any substantive briefing yet. So it’s clear that some decision-makers at the USDA are doing the bidding of the horse soring crowd and the puppy mill folks, and others, too, maybe. There’s just no other explanation for this action.

But what’s noteworthy is that so many businesses under the Animal Welfare Act inspection program agree that the USDA’s action is unwarranted and unjust. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Petland, and Speaking of Research are among stakeholders who’ve spoken out against the purge of these records.

Lawmakers in more than a half-dozen states are angry that state statutes they worked to enact – requiring the sale of dogs only when the breeders are in full compliance with USDA standards – are unworkable now.

And we know that our efforts to crack down on the worst puppy mills will be complicated. Last year, under Vilsack’s leadership, the USDA revoked the licenses of nine puppy mills, most of which The HSUS had identified in our annual Horrible Hundred reports, including breeders who were repeatedly found with injured or dead dogs and puppies on their properties. Without public inspection records, The HSUS and other animal protection groups would have great difficulty obtaining the information needed to press for strong enforcement reforms and seek improvement of standards for commercial breeders.

It was USDA records of violations related to the Animal Welfare Act that helped us achieve those protections against puppy mills, unlawful roadside zoos, and breeders/dealers who sell dogs and other animals to laboratories. But it appears the USDA data related to the HPA is proving to be the most troublesome for the agency, and perhaps was its basis for eliminating the public’s access to its records.

The USDA’s public databases related to the HPA are often used by numerous equestrians who don’t engage in or approve of soring – the intentional infliction of pain on the legs and hooves of Tennessee walking horses and related breeds to create the artificial show gait known as the “big lick” – as a resource to see who they should select or not select as a trainer or breeder of a horse, or while purchasing or selling a horse. Undoubtedly, the removal of these records from the Internet will hurt efforts by legitimate horse owners to shun the abusers who unfortunately cast influence on the breed and its corresponding industry.

The HSUS notified the administration earlier this week that the deactivation of the website database violates the terms pursuant to a 2009 HSUS v. USDA settlement, and the USDA now has 30 days to respond. In keeping with our commitment to fight to restore public access in every available venue, HSUS attorneys have teamed up with pro bono counsel at Latham & Watkins to intervene in the Texas case today to prevent the horse soring proponents and the USDA transition team from cutting any sweetheart deals behind closed doors. We will continue to utilize our resources to the full extent of the law, but we will need your voice to turn around this reckless decision from the USDA.

Tell the USDA to stop protecting animal abusers »

Companion Animals, Equine, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Susan Carter says:

    Did you know Klipperstein was Roy Bunt’s Assistant when the Horse SlaughterDefunding language disappeared from the Budget back in 2012?

  2. Ms Jane YULE says:

    I agree with HSUS 100%. What is going on is evil, senseless and against the law. This should never, ever be allowed to happen.

  3. Lorraine Chambers says:

    Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I’ve signed petitions, called the USDA, and contacted my Senators and Congressman to urge them to bring back the database.

    This is making it next to impossible for animal welfare, advocacy, and rescue organizations to help these innocent, sentient beings.

  4. Ms Jane YULE says:

    What is going on is evil, senseless and against the law. It is abhorrent and must never happen. An action such as getting rid of the thousands of reports on the abuse of animals is destroying the years of difficult, sustained and selfless work of professionals and volunteers. Its value is incalculable, and is absolutely needed to be able to prosecute those who abuse and savage these animals.

    The animals are usually injured forever; take the soring of horses. Their pain is unthinkable, and lasts for years; they are held in unnatural positions, for days and days on end, until their conformation has changed. And that is the tip of the iceberg. Horses die from colic from the cancerous salves applied to their legs. They may die from this untenable pain at the age of eight, 8 years (!), instead of their normal, natural death in their forties.

    The pain of other animals, who are plucked, incredibly crowded, separated from their mothers as soon as they are born, often killed for their fur when they are still alive, is unthinkable.

    These animals who for no fault of their own, are unable to talk, are precious to the existence of everyone. If your throat were cut and you could no longer talk, would you allow any sort of ravaging abuse to be done to you, for the sake of some other’s incalculable greed for money?

    Yours sincerely,
    Jane Yule

  5. Mary Werner says:

    The minute I saw the news, I said to myself I wonder what rich person has gotten Trump to get the animal abuse removed so they could continue to abuse horses. Only recently did I learn that the laws had been strengthened to protect these poor horses so I figured it was the reason all animal abuse would be kept from public eyes. The ridiculous “enhanced” 5th gait caused by the soring of Tennessee Walkers would only appeal to very sick rich people with nothing better to do with their time. The natural 5th gait is beautiful and not as silly looking as the ones in the shows. Horrific are the people that pay to have this done and even worse are the people that take money to abuse these animals.

    • Dawn Homa says:

      Did you not read that this started in February 2016? It’s not as thought trump just snapped his fingers and it was gone. Seriously get a grip

      • Dwedge says:

        What prompts you to defend those whose actions to elect Trump were in fact motivated by his promises to rollback ALL restrictions and regulations. You need to get a damn grip! In fact get a grip while you’re pulling your head out of your a**!

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.