California dairy cows perish, while the state’s almond growers see opportunities for disrupted milk market

By on July 10, 2017 with 15 Comments By Wayne Pacelle

Last week, a heat wave, in tandem with a lack of adequate housing and other safeguards for the animals, resulted in thousands of dairy cows perishing in the punishing heat of California’s Central Valley. It’s one of the worst weather-related incidents to strike dairy herds in recent memory, and rendering plants in California are so overwhelmed with rotting carcasses that county officials are suspending rules against burying the animals whole in mass graves.

The Central Valley is a jarringly hot place in the summer, and global warming may be exacerbating that circumstance. That’s precisely why dairy farmers must be alert and prepared for episodes of intense heat. Having functional and well-placed cooling systems and structures like water misters and adequate shade could go a long way toward preventing the loss of animals.

But there are more problems for dairy cows than overheating and unending exposure to the sun. It’s routine in the conventional dairy industry to keep the animals in a nearly unending state of pregnancy (via artificial insemination) in order to keep the milk flowing. Because they’ve decided that this milk is headed for retail markets and not for the mouths of calves, the farmers take away calves from their mothers soon after birth. These babies and the mothers know what’s going on, and they are distressed by it. It’s truly heartrending to see new mothers bellowing for their calves after watching their newborns carted off.

That’s exactly what an HSUS undercover investigator recently documented at a dairy farm in New York. As you can see in this short HSUS video, anyone who tells you that cows don’t suffer emotionally when their babies are taken away from them is engaging in excuse-making or denial. Maternal deprivation has become one of the hidden ingredients in every glass of cow’s milk and an important question for every consumer to consider.

Cow’s milk, like the milk of any species, is designed for infants, not adults, but if adults have a hankering for milk, they now have an abundance of plant-based options in grocery stores, coffee houses, and other food retail locations. Almond milk, soy milk, coconut milk, rice milk, and other kinds of non-dairy milk represent a full 10 percent of all fluid milk sales in the United States. And where once those seeking dairy-free ice creams were relegated to natural foods stores, now brands like Ben and Jerry’s, Breyers, and Häagen Dazs all offer their own lines of several flavors of vegan ice cream that are sold in regular groceries.

While a decline in dairy consumption might reduce the number of farmers involved in that enterprise, there would likely be a corresponding growth in other sectors of the horticultural economy. In California – the nation’s almond-growing hub – there would be plenty of opportunities to expand almond sales by turning the nuts into milk. This is the sort of dynamism that exists in an adaptive, innovative marketplace, where farmers and other entrepreneurs are offering up more options and consumers are making more informed choices and calibrating the true costs of their choices.

The dairy industry shows more than a few signs that it’s feeling threatened by these other agricultural producers and their innovations in product development and marketing. Big dairy apparently thinks it is not enough for it to use tens of millions in check-off dollars to market its product. It is yet again turning to Congress to impose anti-competitive practices. It doesn’t want other producers to be allowed to use the word “milk,” as if someone buying almond milk might actually be confused as to whether their beverage was bovine-based or not.

U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc. – hailing from the second-largest dairy-producing state – is regrettably carrying a bill aimed at making it illegal to use the word “milk” to market plant-based milks. The bill so far has seen no action on Capitol Hill, but we have no doubt that she’ll try to attach it to the upcoming Farm Bill. That would be an attack on other farmers, and it would not do a thing to help consumers.

The dairy industry should take a much more comprehensive look at animal welfare issues and get its own barn in order instead of trying to hurt other farmers. It was the dairy industry’s own inattention to good animal husbandry that annually produced tens of thousands of downer cows – animals too sick or injured or battered to walk, and dragged into slaughterhouses to make ground beef. The HSUS has fought the mishandling and mistreatment of downer cows for years, and our landmark Hallmark-Westland investigation in Chino, California, was instrumental in securing the enactment of two federal rules to crack down on downer abuses and to require euthanasia of non-ambulatory cows.

It was The HSUS again that led the successful fight to ban the practice of tail-docking of dairy cows, which is now finally being phased out by the industry. But other animal welfare problems remain, including chronic mastitis and lameness within herds.

Both the dairy industry and Congress can collaborate to improve the future of the dairy industry but they should do it more intelligently. With the support of the industry, Congress can establish basic animal welfare standards for the treatment of cows and other farm animals. Instead of doing that, Congress is stonewalling on animal welfare reforms and continuing to provide subsidies to Big Ag and to promote anti-competitive practices to give one sector of the agricultural economy a leg up over others. Those aren’t the right plays, and lawmakers should hear from you on it.

Farm Animals, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Edith mckee says:

    There is no possible way to humanely obtain milk for human consumption. Additionally milk and products made with milk are inherently bad for your health. We need to stop subsidies to this industry, let the prices reflect the true cost of dairy and all the environmental remediation needed. If people paid the true cost dairy would be eliminated. Dairy is bad for animals, humans, and the planet.

  2. Robynne Catheron says:

    Thanks for bringing this torturous industry to light again. I wish it would help. The sound of bellowing mothers and bleating calves is heart-wrenching. It’s not natural for humans to drink cow’s milk, and we’re the only species that regularly drinks the milk of another species.

    I do empathize with the dairy farmers; most have probably been in the industry their entire lives, as well as multiple generations before them. Back then, it was perfectly normal to drink milk, and it was probably all they knew. They know differently now, so hopefully at least some will decide to transition into more humane dairy processing, or even switch to healthier, plant-based milk industry.

    Does Senator Baldwin plan on renaming milkweed, milkwood, or the Milky Way?

  3. Cecelia Colon says:

    The practice of removing calves from their mothers is abominably cruel to both the mother and the calf, and there is no other reason for this other than greed. It does take much to consider the welfare of the animals in an industry that uses these animals for their own economical benefit. To constantly artificially impregnate the cows and then take away their babies is unconscionable. These animals are in a constant state of stress and fear, which cannot be beneficial for their wellbeing. Why not allow them to nurse their calves and then milk them when it is possible after that time? Is it not possible to be humane and have your functioning business at the same time?

  4. S. Pearson says:

    Thanks for this very informative blog. I am phazing out milk more and more and excited to see vegan ice cream produced by large ice cream makers. Mercy is needed.

  5. Mary says:

    Oh the poor cows. This is so sad.

  6. Denni A says:

    nothing would make me happier than to see the entire dairy industry collapse.
    there are no more excuses to drink cow’s milk and all the ugliness behind it.
    it’s been 10 years since I have given up cow’s milk. I use NON-GMO unsweetened soymilk for all my dairy/cooking needs and eat Cashew Milk ice-cream for dessert….yummy. I am always complemented on how creamy my mashed potatoes are with soymilk. the day is fast on the horizon when dairy farms will be outdated animal abuse relics of the past. my sorrow is for the innocent lives who will continue to suffer in misery until that time comes.

  7. Marie says:

    Personally I am not a milk drinker but I have tried those alternatives ie soy and almond and they taste like crap.
    I will drink plain water before I’ll buy any of them.

    • Laura says:

      Its pretty easy to give up drinking milk, and there are cheese alternatives, but what do you do for other milk products like butter, whipping cream, and sour cream?

    • Janet Redbond says:

      Not sure where you live Marie – but here in Australia the Vitasoy Coconut Milk or the Vitasoy Almond Milk are really nice. A lot of the others all curdle or float on the top of the drink. Yes – I have been off dairy for years.

    • Stewart says:

      Have you tried the lately? They are much improved!

  8. Sally Palmer says:

    The cow milk alternatives are growing every day and the ones I use are delicious. Not only do using fewer animal products help my health and reduce animal suffering, but dear God less land devoted to animal farming will result in more innovative food development that will help stretch our earth’s resources and provide better jobs than the nightmare of factory farming. The Humane Economy opened my eyes to huge business potential for everyone.

  9. Vanessa Ivelich says:

    As a native Californian that follows agriculture and holds a Forestry Degree from UC Berkeley, I disagree with the promotion of the Almond Industry.

    While I absolutely agree that the cruel practices of the dairy industry needs to be shut down, I do not recommend that the State of California add any more Almond Trees. Almond Orchards have displaced a large majority of other vital crops that not only provide biodiversity and a balanced ecosystem, but have cost the state countless jobs because of the mechanization of caring for the orchards. Secondly, small and medium sized farmers and ranchers, both small corporations that practice sustainable farming, as well as family owned, are being bought out because of bankruptcy. They simply cannot compete.
    I advise that more research be done before promoting the Almond Industry.

  10. Dana Keefe says:

    Laura, there are alternatives to butter out there. I use a product by “Earth Balance” that is like a margarine–comes in a “buttery spread” in a tub, and in sticks titled vegan buttery sticks.
    Don’t know any substitutes for sour cream or whipped cream.

  11. Modern Dairy Machines says:

    That’s a great share that Dairy farming in California is increasing and the market gained value. Though Almond growers have a grudge because of the disrupted milk market, both the sectors are much needed for the consumers. Thanks for the survey about the California market!

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.