Triple Crown season begins this Saturday with racing industry under a cloud over horse deaths, trainer indictments

By Kitty Block and Sara Amundson

By on June 16, 2020 with 2 Comments

The coronavirus pandemic is not the only problem plaguing the horse racing industry as it prepares for the first of the Triple Crown races at Belmont Stakes this Saturday with altered schedules, shorter race times and a TV-only audience.

This past year has placed the sport—and its key players—under more scrutiny than ever before because of a string of horse deaths, including 18 this year alone at Belmont Park and dozens more at Santa Anita and other racetracks throughout the nation. On top of that, the indictment earlier this year of 27 trainers, veterinarians, pharmacists and drug distributors in a doping scandal has generated more suspicion and skepticism among the sport’s watchers.

As a result, the industry is in greater need than ever before of convincing its dwindling audiences that it cares for the health and welfare of the horses it depends on.

There is no doubt that the horse racing industry today is in disarray and crisis. For decades, some trainers have used the absence of clear national medication standards to push horses to their limit with the use of drugs that can be harmful and even deadly for the animals. The problem began when Congress, in 1980, decided to leave it up to states to come up with their own rules on what drugs to allow in horse racing, leading to a confusing patchwork of state laws with no uniform national standard regarding which drugs are permitted or penalties for doping—a loophole irresponsible trainers take full advantage of by moving horses between states. Congress has since tried to fix the problem over the past four terms, with no success.

The horse racing industry itself, instead of penalizing such trainers, has rallied around them by creating a system that does not even require the bare minimum of accountability. For instance, at present racetracks are not required to report horse injuries; the only ones who do so do it voluntarily. According to The Jockey Club, only 35 out of 113 operating North American racetracks participate in its voluntary Equine Injury Database, a national database of racing injuries that tracks the frequency, types and outcomes of such injuries.

It is not too much to ask all racetracks to report all incidents of fatality and injury. Expanding this database will allow better monitoring of racehorses throughout their careers. Since different states now have their own policies on which drugs are permitted and penalties for doping, horses could be receiving different drugs when they travel to different states for races. All of this needs to be tracked in one single place for the welfare of the animals.

The Humane Society of the United States and the Humane Society Legislative Fund are urging all 38 state racing commissions to voluntarily report all racehorse injuries and deaths into an electronic database and make such information available to the public. This crucial information can be used to not only assess injuries at specific racetracks and compel safety changes, but to improve transparency into racehorse health and injuries throughout a racehorse’s career.

It is also time for Congress to set things right, and we are pushing for the passage of the Horseracing Integrity Act, which will establish a single set of national medication standards as well as create the necessary regulatory force to implement them through an independent regulatory body led by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA). USADA polices medication policy for our Olympic athletes and is the gold standard for ensuring that sports are clean, and athletes protected from trainers who place winning above all else.

There is reason to hope that we will succeed this year in getting this important bill through. The rising number of horse deaths and the indictment of trainers and veterinarians who were allegedly participating in irresponsible drugging has finally focused greater attention on the problems in the racing industry, and it is heartening that even stakeholders on the inside are now speaking out for change. In a scientific report issued last year, The Jockey Club called for reform, warning that “without these reforms, the future of the sport will continue to wane.” Trainers, including Hall of Famer Bob Baffert, have called for passing the Horseracing Integrity Act “to protect the horses who are the stars of the show.”

We simply can’t afford to wait any longer while animals continue to suffer. It is time for horse racing to change course and put the animals it relies on above its profits.


To coincide with the start of the Triple Crown season, we are launching a new campaign, #NotAnotherHorse, focusing on the safety and welfare of all horses. We are demanding that not one more horse should be slaughtered, trained abusively through the cruelty of soring, or die on a racetrack. And to do so we need to pass three key federal horse protection bills: the Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act, which will permanently end the slaughter of America’s beloved horses, both here and abroad; the Prevent All Soring Tactics (PAST) Act, which will finally stop the decades-long torture of Tennessee Walking Horses, forced to perform an artificial, high-stepping show ring gait through painful practices; and the Horseracing Integrity Act, described above. Please contact your members of Congress and ask them to support these important bills so no horse ever suffers at the hands of a bad trainer or is slaughtered for food.


Sara Amundson is president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund.

Categories
Equine, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

2 Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Alan Alejandro Maldonado Ortiz says:

    No es posible que este tipo de cosas sigan pasando y qué más animalitos siguen sufriendo sólo por beneficio económico y diversión

  2. Karen Drennen says:

    In 2018 the USDA categorized horses as livestock not companion animals. The rationale: farm income, prevention of cruelty laws, research into equine diseases/laws that only pertain to livestock. The US government is making billions of dollars on horses, In 2001 the horse industry 112.1 billion. The US government makes money on all animals from UDSA farming, animals used for research. BLM round up 25,000 horses a year by Department of Interior. Horses provide money for entertainment such as rodeos and horse-racing.
    This category has led to horrific abuse of these animals unlike any other.This is the reason that trying to get legislation passed like the SAFE act to prevent exporting of horse meat and PAST act to prevent soring are not being passed and being held up for years. They are sending draft horse colts overseas and butchering them on the way so that in 3 days they will be horse sushi. The American Horse Council agrees and condones this slaughter. Over 100,000 horses are sent overseas a year. It is a big business. Horse racing kills 800 horses a year in US. In California alone Santa Anita averages 50 kills year.. . these numbers mean nothing to them. Due to the livestock category they look at them as if they are cows and are expendable. There is a war on animals and horses are one of the top abused and exploited animals based on their numbers. These animals need re-classified in a sub-category to give them protection. They served in the military, for transportation, serve on police forces and worked hard on farms and won races only to be treated terribly in the end. Contact your representative to take a stand for animals including horses and urge candidates to support animals part of their campaign platform. Animals are a big business and these candidates need to respond to public about our tax dollars and what they are to be used for and not to be used for like exploiting horses. This is an election year and tell them you vote for a candidate that supports and protects horses and all animals. Vote for animals.

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top