Several states introduce bills banning fur, voicing concerns over cruelty, pandemic risk

By on February 4, 2021 with 7 Comments

The momentum to end the use of fur continues to build. As state legislative sessions get under way across the United States, bills to ban fur sales have been introduced in five states so far, including Rhode Island, Oregon, Connecticut, Hawaii and New York. A bill introduced in Washington would ban the production of fur.

The bill in Hawaii will be heard in committee next week. And we expect similar bills will be introduced in other state legislatures in coming weeks.

This is terrific news, and it builds upon the tremendous progress we have already been making in states and localities nationwide. One state, California, banned fur sales in 2019, after four of its cities already had such bans in place. Last year, Wellesley, a town in Massachusetts, passed a ban on fur sales. Similar bans are being considered in other cities, including Minneapolis.

The reason we are seeing such unprecedented interest among lawmakers in moving against fur is both because of a growing distaste among Americans for this unnecessary product built on immense animal cruelty, and concerns about the high pandemic risk posed by fur farms.

Mink at 16 fur farms in four states, Oregon, Michigan, Utah and Wisconsin, have tested positive for the coronavirus. Last week, we learned that a fur worker in Utah had died after contracting the virus. Thousands of mink have also died in these fur farms, and the virus has even been found among wild mink in Utah and Oregon.

Other nations that have discovered infected mink on fur farms, like the Netherlands and France, have already moved to end fur production. Sweden suspended mink fur farming for a year and Denmark, which has also suspended all mink fur farming for a year, is working to proactively shut down the industry by offering fur farmers funding to transition to other livelihoods.

While the pandemic risk has accelerated the movement away from fur, many nations were already turning away from this trade because of the cruelty it perpetrates. Animal protection groups like ours have helped put this cruelty on display by educating the public and through undercover investigations of fur farms. Humane Society International conducted two investigations of fur farms over the past two years that showed the horrific lives that animals like mink and foxes endure in tiny, cramped cages before they are bludgeoned to death. In some cases, as our cameras documented, animals were skinned while alive.

Our work has resulted in consumers, major fashion designers and retailers renouncing fur. As a result, fur sales have been plummeting year after year. As we reported in November, the world’s largest fur auction house, Kopenhagen Furs, based in Denmark, announced it will close its doors over the next three years because of the dropping demand for animal pelts. U.S. fur imports have also been dropping and the fur industry here recorded its worst year in 2019, the latest year for which numbers were available.

We applaud the states that are moving to take action against fur and we urge other states to follow their lead. With the grave risk fur clearly poses to public health, and the cruelty to animals it perpetrates, there is no reason at all to keep this struggling industry alive.

Categories
Public Policy (Legal/Legislative), Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

7 Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Alan Alejandro Maldonado Ortiz says:

    Ya no podemos permitir más violencia hacia los animalitos ya no mas abuso esto tiene que acabar ya

  2. Ewa Urbanski says:

    Endlich ist Bewegung und Einsicht in den Köpfen eingetreten .Hoffentlich für immer
    und ohne Rücksicht auf wirtschaftlichen Verluste in der Pelzindustrie,
    Ich begrüße ist mit meinem ganzen Herzen

  3. Jeane Camargo da Silva says:

    Parabéns!!!! Que Deus abençoe a todos os envolvidos nessa luta!!

  4. patricia clode says:

    Have often said that “I love fur coats” on the Original Owner!!!!!!
    All of the animals I have met are in agreement including my own.

  5. Dorina Rojas says:

    Fur coats, etc. need not come from animals, they can be artificially made from plants and other fabrics and can still be called fur. Vanity for man is cruelty to animals and fashion using these animals is superficial satisfaction – cheap display of beauty but kills animals whose lives are just as precious as those of humans.

  6. Iris Owens says:

    Fur belongs on the backs of animals NOT on the backs of humans!!!!!

  7. Iris Owens says:

    Fur belongs on the backs of animals NOT on the backs of humans!!!!

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top