Austin is the latest city to ban cat declawing. More cities, states consider ending the harmful practice

By on March 5, 2021 with 9 Comments

Cat declawing – the practice of surgically removing a cat’s claws — is a cruel procedure that can be likened to having the last bone of each of your toes amputated. It is unnecessary because there are more humane ways to keep cats from scratching furniture. And for the animal the consequences last a lifetime, including behavioral and health problems.

Fortunately, a growing number of lawmakers are moving to make declawing illegal. Yesterday, Austin became the first city in Texas, and one of a handful of cities nationwide, to ban this procedure unless it is necessary for the cat’s own well-being.

This is great news, and it illustrates changing attitudes among Americans and their lawmakers about subjecting companion animals to procedures like these, which are typically done for purely cosmetic or convenience reasons. New York became the first state in the nation to pass a ban on elective cat declaw surgery in 2019, and Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver and St. Louis have passed similar bans in recent years. More than 20 countries, including England, Germany, Spain, Australia and New Zealand, have also long banned the practice.

Bills on cat declawing have been introduced and are now being considered in several states, including in New Jersey, Massachusetts and Connecticut. We also hope to see similar bills introduced this year or next in Nevada, California, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Illinois, among other states.

Cat owners often mistakenly believe that declawing their cats is a harmless “quick fix” for unwanted scratching. But for a cat, declawing is no trip to the spa. After the surgery, cats, who walk on their toes (unlike humans who walk on the soles of our feet) can face severe problems. Austin veterinarian Katrina Breitreiter, who was at the forefront of passing the ban in her city, says declawing “can lead to long term complications including persistent postoperative pain, back pain, phantom pain, limping, infection, arthritis, overgrooming, toe pad calluses, bone fragments, claw regrowth under the skin, and tendon contracture.” One in five cats has long-term complications from declaw surgery and 50% suffer complications immediately after surgery.

One third of declawed cats develop behavioral problems after declawing.

Scratching is a natural behavior for cats, important for their physical and mental wellbeing. It removes dead husks from their claws, it helps them mark territory, and it helps stretch their muscles. Unfortunately, this natural behavior is considered misbehavior by humans, especially when furniture or other household objects are damaged in the process.  But as Dr. Barbara Hodges of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association points out, there are a range of humane alternatives that do not risk the health and welfare of cats. These include routine nail trims, training, scratching posts and nail caps.

Declawing started without any scientific study or assessment of pain or any understanding of the long-term impacts of multiple amputations. When domestic cats began moving into our homes, shortly after the invention of kitty litter, a crude procedure involving the use of guillotine clippers to amputate cats’ toes was described in a letter from a Chicago practitioner to an American veterinary journal in 1952 as a solution to the damage cats’ claws can cause to furniture. Sadly, the practice became normalized in veterinary medicine.

Thanks to advances in the field, we know so much more today about the ill effects of declawing and increasingly the veterinary community is clear: it needs to end. The veterinarian-led Paw Project has pushed for reform in this area, and organizations like the American Association of Feline Practitioners, the American Animal Hospital Association, the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association and the HSVMA are all opposed to declawing. The largest U.S. veterinary hospital systems – VCA, Banfield and Blue Pearl — do not perform elective declaw procedures on cats. And the American Association of Feline Practitioners banned declawing in their certified “cat friendly practices” at the beginning of this year.

This shift in the veterinary profession needs to be cemented in policy. The HSUS is working closely with the Paw Project to pass laws against declawing in cities and states around the country. As Dr. Jennifer Conrad, founder and director of the Paw Project, emphasizes, “declawing, better described as de-knuckling, has no place in ethical veterinary care.”

We applaud Austin’s council members for making the right decision for cats in their city, and we urge lawmakers around the United States to work swiftly to end this harmful and unnecessary practice.

Companion Animals, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jeane Camargo da Silva says:

    Tomara que essa prática seja extinta. Já basta todo sofrimento que os seres humanos já lhes causam!

  2. Alan Alejandro Maldonado Ortiz says:

    No podemos permitir más de injusticia hacia los seres vivos y a ningún animalito tenemos que aprender a cuidar y respetar a los seres vivos y dejar de abusar de estos gatitos

  3. Sandra Bartareau says:

    I have a Cat Sancuary. Had 200 cats at one time. Would NEVER declawed a cat. Would a human like their nails pulled out?

  4. Ewa Urbanski says:

    Menschen entfernt man auch keine Nägel nur weil sich ein andere daran stört. Es ist grausam wie wir mit den Tieren umgehen.Es muss aufhören.!!!

  5. Elena Nikolova says:


  6. Fredrick Samuels Smith says:

    It’s about time America took steps to ban this horrid practice. Good for Texas.

  7. Leigh says:

    Thank you for writing about this. Great article, here is Corpus Christi we have a problem with people dropping off pets and its heartbreaking finding a declawed cat.

    • Olivia says:

      I am so glad you spoke for Corpus Christi, but I hope all of Texas wakes up and pays attention to the fact that the veterinarians who are performing this cruel inhumane procedure are doing so against their medical OATH ‘thou shall not hurt’. Torture is not legal; so I am not sure why this red state did not irratitcate this all while doing so against women’s rights. Law makers here seem to decide what’s humane or not humane when it politically suits them.

  8. Britt says:

    I really hope we can get this to end. It is so cruel. I was 6 years old when I got my first cat, my mom had her declawed, because she was a normal kitten & scratched the furniture. I remember her coming home from the surgery & her paws being bloody & sore. I didn’t understand the magnitude of what just happened to her at the time. She was a mountain cat and LIVED to be outside. But when my mom had her declawed, it wasn’t safe for her to be where she loved to be anymore. It didn’t stop her from escaping though, and it only made us panic more because we knew she couldn’t defend herself. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to forgive my mom for that, 22 years later & 2 years after she’s been gone. I was just browsing for pet groomers for my current cat, and came across declawing on the services list. I didn’t think it was legal at all anymore. We need to bring this to an end!!!!

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.