Breaking news: Maryland lawmakers say ‘no’ to new cosmetics tests on animals

By Kitty Block and Sara Amundson

By on March 30, 2021 with 12 Comments

Maryland will soon become the fifth U.S. state to say no to cosmetics testing on animals.

State lawmakers last night voted to prohibit new tests on animals for cosmetics and all sales of newly-animal-tested cosmetics beginning July 2022. The Senate and House versions of the bills passed the Maryland Senate unanimously last night and they passed the House with a large majority, demonstrating the clear support in the state for ending such cruel testing.

The bill now heads to the governor’s desk, where we expect he will either sign it or let it pass into law without his signature.

Maryland joins neighboring Virginia, where Gov. Ralph Northam signed a similar bill into law just earlier this month, and three other states that have passed laws ending new cosmetics testing or sales—California in 2018 followed by Nevada and Illinois in 2019.

The laws reflect rising consumer opinion in the United States against unnecessary testing on animals for products like shampoos, mascara and lipstick. During these tests, rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and rats have substances forced down their throats, dripped into their eyes, or smeared onto their skin before they are killed. Cosmetics companies are listening to consumer concerns and many have joined us to support bills in the states moving to end cosmetics testing sales and production. Maryland lawmakers received letters of support from several companies manufacturing or selling cosmetics products in Maryland, including Lush, MOM’s Organic Market, Jill Turnbull and ReNew Botanicals Skin Care, as they considered the bills.

The Personal Care Products Council, the leading national trade association representing approximately 600 personal care products companies, is also supportive of ending new cosmetics testing and partnered with us during the last Congress to lead the federal Humane Cosmetics Act, a bill addressing cosmetics animal testing and imports. We anticipate the bill will soon be reintroduced in the current Congress.

The United States does not require that cosmetics products be tested on animals. Moreover, these test methods are unreliable predictors of human safety. Different species can respond differently when exposed to the same chemicals. Consequently, animal tests may under- or over-estimate real-world hazards to people. Many non-animal methods have been, and continue to be, developed for new ingredients. These methods can combine human cell-based tests and sophisticated computer models to deliver human-relevant results at less cost and in less time than traditional animal tests.

We applaud Maryland lawmakers for taking this decisive step on behalf of animals, and we are especially grateful to Sen. Clarence Lam and Delegate Terri Hill who sponsored the versions of the bill in the Senate and the House of Delegates. The world is moving away from cosmetics testing, with 40 nations having passed laws to end or limit cosmetic animal testing. In the United States, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island are considering similar bans. We urge lawmakers in these and other states to move swiftly and end the cruelty for good.

Sara Amundson is president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund.

Animal Research and Testing, Wildlife/Marine Mammals

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Alan Alejandro Maldonado Ortiz says:

    No podemos permitir más abusos así los animalitos son seres vivos y sienten ellos no merecen vivir así esto tiene que acabar ya nomás abusos ni más violencia hacia los animalitos

  2. Jeane Camargo da Silva says:

    Que notícia maravilhosa! Parabéns aos lutadores da causa! Que Deus os abençoe!!!!

  3. Dave Boules says:

    All lab testing on all animals must be stopped everywhere . There are better ways to test products and everything else. It is not necessary to use animals.

  4. JM says:

    It’s about time. All others should follow too.

  5. Loti Hanlon says:

    No testing on any animals!

  6. lynda fields says:

    Such great news! Maybe people are beginning to think about the poor animals.

  7. Kimberly says:

    Every state should follow suit . This is animals cruelty. So happy to hear this made my night . Big win for animals in maryland

  8. Tom Ngo says:


  9. Lynn4147202214128728 Wiggins says:

    No testing on animals

  10. Rozine says:

    I am so happy that this was resolved, we need never stop helping our beautiful fur babies I sign petitions all the time to put these monsters in jail for their cruelty we all need to speak up for a beautiful little animals God bless all the people that help saving how far babies let’s continue to work together..🐵🦍🦧🐶🐕🐈🐱🐴🦊🐺🐩🐕‍🦺🦁🦓x🐗🦌🐯🐩🐅🐮🐽🐂🐆🦝🐴🐎🦄🐷🐄🐃🐂🐇🐏🐐🐪🦔🦛🦏🐘🦒🦙🐫🐁🦇🐻🐀🐹🐾🐼🐰🦥🐿🦔🦨🦦🐣🐓🐔🐤🐦🐧🦅🦆🦖🐸🦜🦚🦩🦉🦢🐢🦎🐍🐲🐠🐡🦈🐳🐋🐬🐟🐠🐙🐚🐌🦋 and more….

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.