Breaking: European Parliament votes to phase out animal testing and research

By Kitty Block and Sara Amundson

By on September 16, 2021 with 4 Comments

On Wednesday, the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution that calls on the European Commission to draw-up an action plan to phase out animal experiments. This is a momentous political victory in a region where recent setbacks have occurred for animals in laboratories.

Top on the list of setbacks is the revelation that the European Chemical Agency has disregarded the longstanding ban on animal testing for cosmetics by demanding additional animal data for dozens of cosmetic ingredients, which has already killed an estimated 25,000 animals. Humane Society International’s stop-motion short film “Save Ralph” has helped raise awareness on the fact that the public has been misled about the EU’s cosmetics ban.

Many more animals may die in painful toxicity tests if the European Commission implements its Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment, which as proposed would further cement the EU’s “tick-box” approach to chemical hazard assessment based predominantly on animal testing. The Parliament’s resolution correctly points out that non-animal approaches based on human biology are the key to better assess chemical safety. That is one of the reasons why, in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency has committed to phase-out its animal tests requirements by 2035, and the Humane Cosmetics Act is gathering steam in Congress.

The resolution in favor of an action plan to phase out animal testing was championed by HSI/Europe and other animal protection groups, leading European scientists and companies. The overwhelming cross-party support shown by Members of the European Parliament reflects the growing dismay felt toward recent actions and proposals by European Chemical Agency and the European Commission.

The resolution is a strong statement that covers all animal use for research, testing and education, a sobering reminder of the nearly 10 million animals used annually in European laboratories. Nearly 70% of these animals are used in biomedical research, an area where, according to statistics, little to no reduction has been achieved despite a 35-year-old legal requirement that animals must not be used where alternatives are available. Continued reliance on animals as a first resort cannot be justified or allowed to persist in light of the modern non-animal technologies like human organ-chips and next-generation computer models now available.

Recognizing that science has evolved, the Parliament is calling for deep, systemic changes, noting that phasing out animal experiments will require “preferential funding of non-animal methods across all EU research and innovation initiatives,” training scientists in novel approaches and supporting start-up companies offering and perfecting these methods.

Hastening the transition to human-focused approaches to testing and health research is in all our interests. EU parliamentarians should be applauded for their vision and leadership, and other nations are encouraged to follow suit.

Now, we need public voices to join our call to make sure the European Commission listens and delivers an ambitious and life-saving action plan.

Sara Amundson is president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund.

Categories
Animal Research and Testing, Humane Society International, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.

4 Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Christina Vosilla says:

    This has been a long time coming. Please do the right thing across the board. Animals are being used and it’s both ineffective and immoral. Do what’s best for everyone and everything. It may take a ramp up period of investing and training but it will be well worth it.

  2. Patricia Munoz says:

    this has to end, no more animals for practice

  3. joan naylor says:

    Do you have a pet animal?
    Think clearly, would you like to see it caged and being tested for
    ineffective products, with no escape. This is inhumane and putting
    a precious life into a living hell .
    Different paths excluding these animals can be found. Let them
    have the life they were born to. Freedom from pain and suffering. Thank you I know looking at your precious animal you will agree.

  4. Ulrich Stolarczyk says:

    If there are more petitions which help animals in danger, animals tortured by human beings – please send to my e-mail.

    Without doubt, worldwide human beings – some human beings- are bad, brutal. A special group likes to torture animals. But there are different people who protect animals. So do not give up fighting for animals. It is a long hard way, but suffering animals will thank you. So stay in action – keep hope – fight for animals.
    Thank you Ulrich Stolarczyk

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.

Top