US Congress has new chance to better protect animals with game-changing bill

By Kitty Block and Sara Amundson

By on July 27, 2023 with 2 Comments

Responsibility for animals’ welfare rests with us all, including the federal government. Our work spans a range of federal agencies, all of which can do something to support the prevention of animal cruelty and suffering. A whole-of-government approach is consistent with the growth of our movement and its influence, and it’s something that will enable us to confront animal cruelty more effectively in the future.

This sensibility is at the heart of the Better Collaboration, Accountability, and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) for Animals Act. Introduced by Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and John Kennedy, R-La., and Reps. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Penn., and Mike Quigley, D-Ill., the bill would usher in a new era of enhanced interagency cooperation to fight cruelty and uphold the proper treatment of animals.

The bill is designed to strengthen the capabilities of the U.S. Department of Justice, which has played an important enforcement role in animal fighting cases over the years, and more recently in cases involving animal exhibitors and dealers. With greater authority the agency could do more.

The Better CARE for Animals Act would augment the relatively limited powers the DOJ has under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) by providing more enforcement tools, including license revocations, civil penalties and a process for pursuing appropriate seizure/forfeiture in cases in which animals are suffering as a result of AWA violations.

It makes sense that those crafting the AWA in 1966 chose to designate the U.S. Department of Agriculture, with its veterinary and public health expertise, as lead agency for the development, promulgation and enforcement of standards. But in the intervening six decades, Congress has placed an increasing number of animal welfare issues and inspection and enforcement needs within the AWA’s range of coverage. Currently, it encompasses welfare concerns relating to animals bred for the pet trade and to supply laboratories, animals in entertainment and display, animals used in fighting, and animals’ treatment in research and testing, among others.

Something else has changed too. Public interest in minimizing the needless suffering of animals has substantially increased, and that has stoked demand for additional protective legislation.

Capacity at the USDA has not kept pace with these developments. The agency has just three administrative law judges, not enough to handle the workload involved. Moreover, a different kind of expertise, more typically associated with the DOJ, is badly needed. The Better CARE for Animals Act is supported by appropriations language we have championed and obtained in each of the last few years, specifically calling for closer collaboration and coordination between the USDA and the DOJ.

The DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division enforces the federal government’s civil and criminal environmental laws and defends against challenges to government environmental action. It has demonstrated serious commitment to animal welfare cases since its establishment, particularly in relation to the AWA’s animal fighting prohibitions.

But the DOJ has done much more, and over the last several years we have been impressed by the agency’s determination to address animal cruelty with the tools it already has under law. For example, in May 2022, the agency filed a lawsuit over shocking AWA violations at a facility owned by Envigo, a company that breeds animals for use in research and testing. A DOJ injunction led to the transfer of roughly 4,000 beagles last summer, and the company ultimately closed that facility.

In November 2020, the DOJ filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” fame) for AWA and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. Lowe, et al.). Eventually, the federal government seized 68 big cats, including lions and tigers. It sought seizure of the animals pursuant to the ESA’s civil forfeiture provision.

The DOJ brought its first puppy mill case in 2021, against a licensed dog breeder in Iowa whose facility had at least 100 AWA violations in a six-month period and who eventually entered into a consent decree that closed his operation. More than 500 dogs were removed from that puppy mill, and the DOJ helped to ensure that they went to a responsible shelter and its partner groups for placement in new homes.

Our view is that the DOJ shouldn’t have to navigate animal cruelty cases with limited enforcement tools. We have been involved in a few cases with which the USDA and/or the DOJ were connected, including the one involving the Envigo beagles, animals who HSUS responders transferred to shelter and rescue groups for adoption. The Envigo case revealed some of the challenges the USDA faces with respect to enforcement, and the need for better, stronger and more coordinated interagency action. The Better CARE for Animals Act epitomizes such an approach. It is truly a 21st century measure, one that’s worthy of a nation becoming ever more serious in its commitment to animals and their protection.

Urge your legislator to cosponsor the Better CARE for Animals Act.

Sara Amundson is president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund.

Animal Rescue and Care, Public Policy (Legal/Legislative)

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.


Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. johanna Dordick says:

    We all love our dogs. And we want to do everything we can to help to protect and care for them — All dogs in all conditions. But I am sick about what is happening to wolves who are being cruelly slaughtered — nursing mothers and their pups being killed in their dens, hunters seeking out and killing the leaders — mothers and fathers, shooting, running them down to exhaustion with dogs and snow mobiles — leaving the young to die of starvation or killed, shot, left with no protection from other animals. Don’t people realize that wolves are dogs — and that the wonderful qualities we so love in dogs come from wolves? — Smart, loving, compassionate mates, family members, who live for their pups. -They do not attack people, do not kill for pleasure like people but to be able to eat and feed their families. They are worthy of respect and protection from people who kill them for pleasure, destroying families, and causing horrible suffering. It’s time people who love dogs rise up in protection of these amazing creatures and help them. What are these organizations doing to help protect wolves??? Google “Wolves in Idaho, in Wisconsin, in Montana in Wyoming” where it is now and has been for the last many years, hundreds killed in Killing Contests, It is Open Season on wolves. When will these organizations stand up for wolves?

  2. Karin Erker says:

    Danke für den Einsatz für die Tiere …. Was sind das für Menschen, die Tiere so quälen und töten … stop

Share a Comment

The HSUS encourages open discussion, and we invite you to share your opinion on our issues. By participating on this page, you are agreeing to our commenting policy.
Please enter your name and email address below before commenting. Your email address will not be published.